That’s Not My Neighbor: An Introduction to Gameplay Basics

By /

Okay, here is a detailed article introducing the gameplay basics of “That’s Not My Neighbor,” aiming for approximately 5000 words.

Welcome to the Neighborhood Watch: An In-Depth Introduction to the Gameplay Basics of “That’s Not My Neighbor”

The year is 1955. The Cold War brews, McCarthyism casts a long shadow of paranoia, and underneath the veneer of suburban tranquility, something deeply unsettling is taking root. You’ve just landed a new job – perhaps out of desperation, perhaps seeking a quiet life – as the doorman for a seemingly ordinary apartment building. But this is no ordinary gig. In the unsettling world of the indie horror sensation “That’s Not My Neighbor,” developed by Nacho Sama, your simple task of verifying residents and visitors becomes a high-stakes battle against infiltration by terrifying entities known only as Doppelgangers.

This article serves as your comprehensive orientation guide. We will delve deep into the fundamental mechanics, strategic considerations, and atmospheric nuances that make “That’s Not My Neighbor” a uniquely tense and compelling experience. Whether you’re a prospective doorman steeling your nerves or a new recruit fumbling with the checklist, consider this your essential briefing before you face your first visitor at the window. Prepare yourself – the safety of the entire building rests on your vigilance, your attention to detail, and your ability to discern the human from the horrifyingly not human.

The Premise: More Than Just Checking IDs

At its core, “That’s Not My Neighbor” places you in the confined space of a doorman’s booth. Your primary responsibility is straightforward: check the identification and paperwork of everyone seeking entry into the apartment building and determine if they are a legitimate resident or guest. If they are who they claim to be, you buzz them in. If they are not – if they are a Doppelganger – you must deny them entry and report them to the enigmatic Doppelganger Detection Department (D.D.D.).

Sounds simple, right? Deceptively so. The true challenge lies in the how. Doppelgangers are insidious mimics. They can look almost identical to the real residents, possess seemingly legitimate documents, and even attempt conversation. Your job is not just to glance at an ID but to become a meticulous detective, scrutinizing every minute detail, cross-referencing information, using the limited tools at your disposal, and ultimately making a judgment call that could have dire consequences. Let the wrong one in, and… well, the game makes it chillingly clear that failure is not an option if you value the lives within (and perhaps your own). Deny a genuine resident, and you face reprimands, potential penalties, and the gnawing guilt of inconveniencing an innocent person caught in this paranoid reality.

Setting the Scene: The Oppressive Atmosphere of 1955

Before we dissect the mechanics, it’s crucial to understand the game’s environment. The 1955 setting isn’t just window dressing; it permeates the gameplay and contributes significantly to the horror.

  • Aesthetic and Technology: The visuals embrace a stylized, slightly cartoonish yet deeply unsettling retro look. Your booth is equipped with technology appropriate for the era: a rotary phone, physical files, paper checklists, a clunky buzzer system. This lack of modern digital convenience forces a reliance on manual checks and tangible evidence. There are no facial recognition databases or instant background checks here. It’s just you, the paperwork, the person at the window, and your wits. The slightly fuzzy, CRT-monitor-like filter over the visuals adds to the sense of unease and period authenticity.
  • Paranoia and Suspicion: The mid-1950s were a time of heightened fear and suspicion in America. The fear of communist infiltration mirrors the game’s fear of Doppelganger infiltration. Neighbors suspected neighbors, and conformity was often equated with safety. This undercurrent of societal anxiety is palpable in the game. Every interaction is tinged with doubt. Is this person really who they say they are? What subtle sign might give them away? This thematic resonance amplifies the tension of your task.
  • Isolation and Confinement: You are largely confined to your small booth. The window acts as your primary interface with the outside world, creating a sense of claustrophobia and vulnerability. You are the gatekeeper, the first and often only line of defense, yet you are physically separated and somewhat powerless beyond your ability to grant or deny access. This isolation heightens the psychological pressure.

Understanding this context is key. You aren’t just playing a puzzle game; you are stepping into a specific historical and emotional landscape where vigilance is survival, and trust is a dangerous luxury.

The Core Objective: Identify and Neutralize (or Admit)

Let’s reiterate the fundamental goal:

  1. Identify: Determine the true nature of the individual requesting entry. Are they a genuine resident listed in the building’s directory, or are they a Doppelganger attempting to infiltrate?
  2. Act:
    • If Resident: Grant access using the appropriate mechanism (usually a green buzzer/button).
    • If Doppelganger: Deny access and immediately report them to the D.D.D. using the designated emergency system (often a red button or specific phone protocol).

The game typically progresses day by day (or shift by shift). Each successful identification (admitting a resident, correctly identifying and reporting a Doppelganger) contributes positively. Each failure (admitting a Doppelganger, mistakenly denying a resident) carries negative consequences, ranging from terrifying in-game events and potential game overs to penalties that might affect your standing or ability to continue.

Your Workspace: The Tools of the Trade

Your small booth is your command center. Familiarizing yourself with its layout and the function of each element is paramount. While exact layouts might vary slightly depending on game updates or versions, the core tools generally include:

  1. The Service Window: Your primary view of the visitor. This is where they present themselves and their documents. Pay close attention not just to the documents passed through, but to the visitor themselves – their appearance, their demeanor, any subtle oddities.
  2. Document Slot/Tray: Where visitors place their IDs and entry request forms for your inspection.
  3. The Resident Directory/Files: This is arguably your most critical resource besides the documents themselves. It’s typically a binder, folder, or rolodex containing information on all legitimate residents of the building. Key information usually includes:
    • Resident’s Full Name
    • Apartment Number
    • Physical Appearance Description: This is vital. It might describe hair color, distinguishing features (glasses, mustache, mole), general build, etc. This description must be compared against both the ID photo and the person standing at your window.
    • Sometimes, it might contain other notes or flags.
  4. The Checklist: A daily list of expected arrivals or simply a procedural checklist to guide your verification process. This often needs to be cross-referenced with the main resident directory and the presented documents. It might highlight specific residents expected that day or contain other pertinent operational notes.
  5. The Telephone: A crucial tool for verification and emergencies. Its functions typically include:
    • Calling the Resident’s Apartment: You can often call the apartment number provided by the visitor (or found in the directory) to verify their identity or presence. Does someone answer? Does the voice match expectations (if known)? Does the visitor react strangely to the call? What if the line is busy, or no one answers? These are all pieces of the puzzle.
    • Calling the D.D.D. (Doppelganger Detection Department): This is your emergency line. When you are certain you have identified a Doppelganger, you use the phone (or a dedicated emergency button connected to it) to report them. This usually triggers a specific sequence where the threat is neutralized (often off-screen, maintaining suspense). Using this inappropriately (e.g., on a real resident) will likely result in severe penalties.
  6. Entry Buzzer/Button (Green): Used to unlock the door and grant access to confirmed residents. Pressing this for a Doppelganger is a critical failure.
  7. Emergency Alarm/D.D.D. Button (Red): Used to signal the D.D.D. upon positive identification of a Doppelganger. Pressing this for a genuine resident is also a significant error.
  8. Clock: Time is often a factor. The game progresses through your shift, and you need to process visitors efficiently but accurately. Rushing leads to mistakes.

Mastering the use and cross-referencing of these tools is the essence of survival in “That’s Not My Neighbor.”

The Visitors: Residents vs. Doppelgangers

Every time the bell rings or a shadow falls across your window, your process begins. You will encounter two categories of individuals:

  1. Genuine Residents: These are the actual humans who live in the building. They should (in theory) have valid identification and entry forms that match the information in your resident directory. Their physical appearance should align with both their ID photo and the description in your files. They generally behave normally, though some might be understandably impatient or slightly quirky. Your goal is to verify them swiftly and accurately and grant them entry.
  2. Doppelgangers: These are the monstrous entities mimicking residents. Their goal is infiltration. They are the source of the game’s horror and challenge. Doppelgangers can range from blatantly obvious fakes to incredibly subtle mimics. Their disguises might have flaws in:
    • Documentation: Expired IDs, incorrect names or apartment numbers, mismatched ID numbers, forged appearances on photos, typos, unusual formatting.
    • Physical Appearance: Features not matching the ID photo or the directory description (wrong hair color, missing glasses, incorrect facial structure, unnatural skin texture, slightly “off” eyes, subtle distortions, sometimes even extra or missing body parts in more obvious cases).
    • Behavior: Stilted movements, unnatural stillness or excessive fidgeting, strange vocalizations or silences, odd reactions to questions or phone calls. They often fall into the “uncanny valley” – looking almost human, but with something fundamentally wrong that triggers a sense of unease.

Your primary function is to tell these two groups apart using the verification process.

The Verification Process: A Meticulous Step-by-Step Breakdown

This is the heart of the gameplay loop. Precision and thoroughness are non-negotiable. Missing a single discrepancy can be fatal. Here’s a detailed breakdown of the steps you should take with every visitor:

Step 1: Initial Greeting and Document Request

  • The visitor arrives at the window. They might offer a greeting or simply wait expectantly.
  • Politely (or as per procedure) request their identification and reason for entry (usually via a standardized entry request form).
  • Observe their initial demeanor as they retrieve and pass the documents. Are they overly nervous? Unusually calm? Does anything seem immediately out of place about their appearance even before you have the documents?

Step 2: Receiving and Organizing Documents

  • Take the documents provided (typically an ID card and an Entry Request slip).
  • Place them systematically on your desk space for easy comparison. Don’t just glance; prepare for detailed scrutiny.

Step 3: Deep Dive into Document Examination

This is where the detective work truly begins. Examine each document individually and then cross-reference them against each other and your internal records.

  • A. Examining the Identification Card (ID):

    • Photograph: Does the person in the photo exactly match the person standing at your window? Look for discrepancies in facial structure, hairstyle and color, presence/absence of glasses, moles, scars, or other distinguishing features. Crucially, also compare the photo to the physical description in your resident directory later. Sometimes the visitor might match the photo, but neither matches the official description!
    • Full Name: Read the name clearly. Does it sound familiar? Note it down or keep it in mind for checking against the Entry Request and the Resident Directory. Look for subtle misspellings or variations.
    • ID Number: Does the format look correct? While you might not have a database to check validity initially, note it. Sometimes Doppelganger IDs have nonsensical or improperly formatted numbers. Does it match the number potentially listed elsewhere (like the checklist)?
    • Expiration Date: Is the ID current? An expired ID is a major red flag. Ensure the date format is logical for 1955.
    • Date of Birth / Age: Does the apparent age of the visitor roughly match the age suggested by the date of birth?
    • Physical Description on ID (Height, Weight, Eye Color, etc.): Does this information broadly match the visitor? Be cautious; Doppelgangers might get these details right on the ID even if their physical form is slightly off, or vice-versa. This is often less reliable than direct visual comparison but can be another data point.
    • Overall Authenticity: Does the card itself look legitimate? Are there smudges, signs of tampering, unusual fonts, incorrect logos (if any are expected), or a general “feel” of being fake? Is the lamination (if any) peeling? Is the cardstock unusual?

  • B. Examining the Entry Request Form:

    • Full Name: Does the name written on the request form exactly match the name on the ID card? Any discrepancy, even a single letter, is highly suspicious.
    • Apartment Number: Note the apartment number they are requesting entry to. Is it a valid apartment number within the building?
    • Date: Is the date on the request form correct for the current day? An old or future date is a red flag.
    • Signature: While harder to verify, does the signature look rushed, forged, or unusual in any way? (This is often a minor check).
    • Reason for Entry (if applicable): Does it make sense? (Usually, it’s just “Resident”).

Step 4: Cross-Referencing with the Resident Directory/Checklist

This step ties everything together. Use the information gathered from the documents to check against your official records.

  • Find the Resident: Locate the resident in your directory using either the name provided or the apartment number listed on the entry request.
    • If you search by name (from the ID/request), does the apartment number in the directory match the one on the request form?
    • If you search by apartment number (from the request), does the resident name in the directory match the one on the ID and request form?
    • CRITICAL: What if the name and apartment number combination doesn’t exist in your directory at all? This is an almost certain Doppelganger (or potentially a new resident you haven’t been briefed on, adding a layer of complexity in some scenarios, though usually it means Doppelganger).
    • What if the resident is listed, but your daily checklist indicates they are out of town or not expected? Another major red flag.
  • Verify Physical Appearance Description: Once you’ve found the correct resident entry, carefully read the physical description provided in the directory. Now, compare this description against both the person at the window and the ID photo.
    • Does the hair color match?
    • Are they wearing glasses if the description says they should be (or vice-versa)?
    • Does the description mention a distinctive feature (mole, scar, beard) that is present or absent on the visitor?
    • This is often where subtle Doppelgangers fail. They might create a perfect visual match for the ID photo, but the directory description contains a detail that neither the photo nor the mimic got right. For example, the directory says “Mr. Smith always wears a hat,” but the visitor isn’t wearing one. Or, “Ms. Jones has a prominent birthmark on her left cheek,” but the visitor’s cheek is clear.
  • Check for Special Notes: Does the directory entry have any warnings, special instructions, or notes about this resident? (e.g., “Recently changed appearance,” “Lost ID – awaiting replacement,” “Is expecting a guest today”).

Step 5: Direct Visual Scrutiny of the Visitor (The Uncanny Valley Check)

While comparing documents, continuously observe the person at the window. Now, focus intently on them, looking for signs of non-humanity. This requires keen observation and trusting your gut feeling. Look for:

  • Facial Features: Are the eyes symmetrical? Do they blink normally? Is the gaze fixed or unnatural? Is the smile too wide, too static, or showing unusual teeth? Is the skin texture smooth, waxy, or subtly distorted? Are features slightly disproportionate?
  • Body Language and Movement: Are they unnaturally still? Do they exhibit repetitive, jerky movements? Is their posture strange? Do they seem to react inappropriately to sounds or your actions?
  • Clothing and Details: Does the clothing seem correct for the era and the person? Are there any oddities like mismatched buttons, strange textures, or items appearing/disappearing? Sometimes, more obvious Doppelgangers might have blatant physical errors like extra fingers, distorted limbs, or parts of their disguise “glitching.”
  • Aura of “Wrongness”: This is subjective but crucial. Does the person just feel off? The uncanny valley effect is powerful. Trust that instinct – but always back it up with verifiable evidence from the other checks. Don’t rely solely on a vague feeling, but don’t ignore it either.

Step 6: Utilizing the Telephone

If doubts persist, or as part of standard procedure, use the phone.

  • Calling the Resident’s Apartment:
    • Dial the apartment number listed for the resident (either from their request form after verifying it matches the directory, or directly from the directory entry).
    • Scenario 1: Someone Answers. Is it the resident? Does their voice sound right (if you have any reference)? What do they say? You might ask, “Is this [Resident’s Name] in apartment [Number]?” or “Just verifying your entry request.” Does the visitor at the window react? Do they look nervous, angry, or confused? What if the voice on the phone sounds distressed or says something alarming like “Don’t let them in!”?
    • Scenario 2: No One Answers. This could mean the resident isn’t home… which makes the person at your window highly suspicious. Or, perhaps they are genuinely just stepping out and didn’t reach the phone in time. This adds ambiguity.
    • Scenario 3: Busy Signal. Could be innocent, could be suspicious. Less conclusive than the other two.
    • Consider the Visitor’s Reaction: How does the person at the window react while you make the call? Do they try to stop you? Do they suddenly look terrified? Or do they remain nonchalant? Their reaction is another piece of data.
  • Calling the D.D.D. (Only When Certain): This isn’t a verification tool for uncertainty; it’s the action you take after you’ve concluded the visitor is a Doppelganger based on failed checks. The procedure will likely involve selecting the D.D.D. contact and confirming the report. This should trigger an immediate response to handle the threat.

Step 7: Synthesizing the Information

Review all the evidence you’ve gathered:

  • ID vs. Visitor Appearance
  • ID vs. Request Form
  • ID & Request vs. Directory (Name, Apt #)
  • Directory Description vs. Visitor Appearance
  • Directory Description vs. ID Photo
  • Phone Call Results (if made)
  • Overall Document Authenticity
  • Visitor’s Demeanor and Physical Oddities

Are there any discrepancies? In the paranoid world of “That’s Not My Neighbor,” even a single, verifiable inconsistency is often enough to confirm a Doppelganger. A mismatched name, an expired ID, a missing feature described in the directory, failure to appear on the resident list – these are usually damning pieces of evidence.

Step 8: Making the Decision – Admit or Deny/Report

This is the moment of truth. Based on your thorough investigation:

  • If ALL checks pass: Every document aligns, the name and apartment match the directory, the physical appearance matches the ID photo AND the directory description, the phone call (if made) raised no alarms, and the visitor exhibits no overtly unnatural traits – then they are likely a genuine resident. Press the Green Buzzer/Button to grant entry. You might receive a polite nod or thanks as they proceed.
  • If ANY significant discrepancy is confirmed: You found a mismatch in names, numbers, dates, appearance vs. description, or they failed the phone check, or they have clear physical anomalies, or they aren’t listed in the directory – you have identified a Doppelganger. Do not grant entry. Immediately use the Red Emergency Button or the designated phone procedure to contact the D.D.D.

The Weight of the Choice: Don’t make this decision lightly. A false positive (reporting a real resident) has negative consequences. A false negative (admitting a Doppelganger) can be catastrophic, often leading to a game over screen depicting or implying the grim results of your failure.

Consequences: The Fruits (or Horrors) of Your Labor

Your performance is tracked, and your actions have immediate repercussions:

  • Successfully Admitting a Resident: The game progresses. You’ve done your job correctly for this interaction. The resident enters safely.
  • Successfully Identifying and Reporting a Doppelganger: The threat is neutralized (often accompanied by sounds or brief visuals indicating the D.D.D.’s intervention). You have protected the building. This is a successful outcome. The game progresses, possibly with a score increase or positive feedback.
  • Mistakenly Admitting a Doppelganger: This is the primary failure state. The game will often interrupt with a specific, terrifying sequence. This could involve a jump scare, a chilling cutscene showing the Doppelganger inside the building, or simply an abrupt game over screen with an ominous message. You’ll likely need to restart the day or from a checkpoint.
  • Mistakenly Denying/Reporting a Genuine Resident: The resident will likely complain vociferously. You may receive an immediate warning or penalty notification from building management or the D.D.D. This could negatively impact your score, potentially lead to warnings or dismissal after repeated offenses, and adds to the psychological stress of the job. The game forces you to second-guess yourself – was that tiny detail really a discrepancy, or was I just being paranoid?

Escalating Difficulty and Game Progression

“That’s Not My Neighbor” doesn’t stay static. As you successfully complete shifts or days, the challenge typically ramps up:

  • More Subtle Doppelgangers: Early Doppelgangers might have obvious flaws (wildly wrong names, monstrous features). Later ones become masters of mimicry, with discrepancies reduced to tiny details – a single digit off on an ID number, a slight variance in eye color mentioned only in the directory, a barely perceptible facial twitch.
  • Increased Volume of Visitors: You might have less time between visitors, forcing you to be both thorough and efficient. The pressure mounts as the queue grows.
  • More Complex Scenarios: The game might introduce new types of checks, residents with unusual circumstances (lost IDs, recent changes in appearance that haven’t been updated in the file yet), or environmental challenges.
  • Ambiguity: Some situations might be deliberately ambiguous, forcing you to weigh conflicting evidence or make a call based on limited information. Was that resident genuinely flustered, or was it a Doppelganger’s poor acting?
  • Nightmare Mode/Challenge Modes: Many games of this type include harder difficulty settings after completing the main game, featuring even more devious Doppelgangers, stricter penalties, and perhaps new mechanics designed to test veteran players.

Tips for Survival: Becoming a Master Doorman

Navigating the dangers of 1955 requires more than just following steps; it requires developing an instinct and strategy. Here are some tips for new players:

  1. Be Methodical, Every Single Time: Create a mental checklist (or even a physical one beside your monitor!) and go through it rigorously for every visitor. ID photo vs. person. ID name vs. request name. Names & Apt# vs. directory. Directory description vs. person. Don’t skip steps, even if someone seems obviously legitimate or obviously fake. Complacency kills.
  2. Trust Your Gut, But Verify: That uncanny valley feeling? It’s often right. If someone feels profoundly “wrong,” scrutinize them extra carefully. However, don’t rely only on gut feeling. Find the concrete evidence (a document flaw, a description mismatch) to justify calling the D.D.D.
  3. Use All Your Tools: Don’t rely solely on visual checks or document checks. Use the phone when in doubt. Cross-reference the directory meticulously. Each tool provides a different angle of verification.
  4. Sweat the Small Stuff: Doppelgangers often hide in the details. A slightly wrong date format, a missing middle initial, a scar mentioned in the file but absent on the face – these tiny things are often the only tell. Become a pixel-hunter, a typo-detector.
  5. Learn Common Doppelganger Traits: As you play, you might notice patterns in how Doppelgangers fail. Perhaps they frequently mess up expiration dates, or certain physical features are harder for them to mimic. Recognizing these patterns can speed up your identification process (but don’t let it make you complacent!).
  6. Manage Your Time, But Don’t Rush: Efficiency is important, especially as visitor frequency increases. But rushing leads to overlooked details. Find a balance. If you need a moment to double-check something complex, take it. Better to delay slightly than to let a monster in.
  7. Stay Calm Under Pressure: The game is designed to be tense. The music, the sound design, the potential for jump scares – it all adds up. Take deep breaths. Focus on the procedure. Panicking leads to mistakes.
  8. Accept Mistakes Will Happen: Especially early on, you will make mistakes. You’ll let a Doppelganger in, or you’ll deny a real resident. Learn from it. Why did you miss the clue? What check did you skip? Use each failure as a learning opportunity.

Thematic Resonance: Why Does It Work?

Part of the game’s success lies in how its mechanics tap into deeper fears and themes:

  • Fear of the Unknown/Imposter Syndrome: The core horror comes from the inability to be certain who you can trust, the fear that something malevolent hides behind a familiar face. It plays on the primal fear of the “other” disguised as the “self.”
  • Bureaucracy as Horror: The reliance on rigid procedures, paperwork, and checklists in the face of existential terror creates a unique kind of dread. The mundane becomes monstrous. Your powerlessness is emphasized by the bureaucratic hoops you must jump through.
  • Consequences and Responsibility: The weight of knowing that a single mistake can lead to disaster makes every decision impactful. You are directly responsible for the safety of unseen others, adding a moral dimension to the puzzle gameplay.
  • Paranoia and Observation: The game forces you into a state of hyper-vigilance, mirroring the societal paranoia of its setting. You learn to distrust everyone and everything, constantly scanning for threats.

Conclusion: Your Shift Begins Now

“That’s Not My Neighbor” transforms the seemingly mundane job of a doorman into a nerve-wracking exercise in observation, deduction, and survival. By mastering the core gameplay loop – meticulously checking documents, cross-referencing with the resident directory, scrutinizing physical appearances, utilizing the phone, and making calculated decisions – you can stand against the tide of uncanny infiltrators threatening the building.

The path is fraught with peril. Doppelgangers grow more cunning, the pressure mounts, and the line between human and mimic blurs. Mistakes carry chilling consequences, while success relies on unwavering attention to detail and nerves of steel. The oppressive 1955 atmosphere, the reliance on analog tools, and the constant threat lurking just beyond the windowpane combine to create a potent and memorable horror experience.

This guide has laid out the fundamentals, the tools, the procedures, and the stakes. But reading about it is one thing; experiencing the tension firsthand is another. So, straighten your uniform, check your directory, put your finger near the D.D.D. button, and prepare for the first ring of the bell. Your shift has begun. Check everyone. Trust no one (entirely). And whatever you do, make absolutely sure… that’s not your neighbor you’re letting in. Good luck. You’ll need it.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top